Ideally, this would allow the generation of a spacial distribution which preemptively compensates for the expected changes.
TEST with experiment and iteratively improve model....by testing impact and relevance of different effects
(for example space charge, MORE effects?) in general and depending on the beam properties (energy, charge, custom(?) temporal and spacial pattern)
in simulations as well as crosscheck with measurements
-----------
TODO: rewrite with more focus on the FLASH und less on microbeams, but more as second schwerpunkt
- https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-3947(02)00086-9 shows electron beam through mask, but beamlets combine again after some 10 mmm. what if e beam directly micro structured, infestigate how this would propagate through accelerator and later through air, water and matter
Dose-Volume Effect, where the tolerance of normal tissue to radiation
damage increases dramatically as the radiation field size decreases, ???
--------------------
develop predictions/simulations as well as select correct diagnostics
test both with measurements
flash, short pulses but how short when arriving
micro-structured beams
spacial light modulator -> structuring possible but what arrives at target due to scattering and space charge effects (between beamlets)?!!
pulse charakteristik bunch strukture, mikro beams
probleme auch pulse längen messung nicht nur charge
tests possible at different energies
flute as rf-based accelerator and maybe ATHENA as laser based accelerator as (preliminary) source of short electron pulses
THz/x-ray from KARA?
--------------
these studies will define an optimal set...
these studies will provide simulation tools(?)/simulations for ...(pulse customarily shaped in space and time) ( transport through accelerator to target supported by specialized(?) diagnostics)